In the height of Greece’s power in the Ancient times, the Spartans and Peloponnese regarded that a woman dying by child-birth was as honorable and difficult as a soldier heading off to war. There is, of course, precedence for this. Child-birth can be difficult and bloody and one wrong move could have devastating effects.
This brings up the topic of Erb’s palsy which is a paralysis caused by injury during child-birth. Oftentimes, this is due to carelessness or negligence during the delivery. Perhaps the baby was delivered too quickly or too much force was exerted in the attempt to pull the baby out of the womb and a nerve was damaged. This can sometimes be corrected over the course of several months through surgery and physical therapy. If left untreated, the paralysis in the child’s arm could become stunted and some cases even state that the entire arm could be entirely and permanently paralyzed throughout the person’s life.
In this kind of situation, if there is someone who is responsible for the newborn’s paralysis, that person should then be held accountable for the consequences that have been thrust upon the child. Medical practitioners are expected to practice a certain standard of care with every patient in order to avoid causing unnecessary and completely avoidable side-effects such as this. When they fail to render safe services to the point that they actually cause more harm than good, it can be said that they’ve behaved negligently. While doctors have difficult, stressful jobs, negligence that has lifelong negative consequences should not be tolerated.
Injuries that involve burns and scalds are often very painful injuries that can lead to permanent physical damages. According to the website of the Cazayoux Ewing Law Firm, these injuries can be caused by a number of things: electric shock, chemicals, extreme heat and sometimes even extreme cold. Burns and scalds are common injuries in workplace accidents, particularly in places where the workers are exposed to chemicals, extreme heat, and electrical equipment or machinery. Those who work with these are always at risk of burn and scald injuries and should be fully aware of the risks involved in their job. Nevertheless, it is still the employers’ responsibilities to ensure that the workers are properly trained and have the right safety equipment to guarantee their protection.
It is the employers’ responsibility to evaluate the natural risks that come with the job, and failing to provide such safety procedures and safety gears can make them liable not only for workers’ compensation but also for personal injury claims. Burns and scalds are not only painful injuries, they can cost a lot of medical expenses because of the length of treatment depending on the severity of the injury. Aside from financial problems, these injuries can also cause emotional and physical problems. With serious physical disfigurement, those who have burns, scalds and scarring can suffer from depression and even physical limitations due to their injuries. When the effects of the burns and scalds resulted in serious damages to the victim, filing personal injury claim is a real option, especially when the accident was caused by negligent or reckless actions (or inaction) of another person.
Although financial compensation may not be enough to undo the damage caused by the burns, scalds or scarring, it can be beneficial to help cover for the expenses of long-term treatment, medications, lost days at work, rehabilitation, and even counseling and cosmetic surgery. The amount of compensation will depend on the severity and impact of the injuries, and the “burden of proof” will depend on the evidence that you can present to the court.
According to data gathered by the United States Bureau, an average of 10.6 million motor vehicle accidents occurred each year between 2004 and 2009. Such a significant number proves how common car crashes and road accidents are in America. Considering the statistics, it won’t come as a surprise when you suddenly find yourself in the same situation. The website of McCutchen & Sexton – The Law Firm suggests taking the following steps should you ever find yourself in a minor collision.
When you become involved in a car crash, the first thing you will need to do is gather as much information about the incident as you possibly can. Note down the date and exact time of the accident. If the weather was bad, take note of the weather conditions as well. It’s important that you exchange information with the other driver involved in crash. Get their name, address, license number and expiration date, as well as their insurance details. You should also try to learn more about the car they were driving by asking for the vehicle registration. If they had passengers, try to get to know them as well. In turn, you should offer the other driver the same information.
It is also crucial to gather information about individuals who have witnessed your accident. Ask them if they can recount what had happened from what they saw, and ask for their names, addresses, and telephone numbers. If you can, you should also take pictures of the scene. When the police arrive, you should note down the name and badge number of the office you are speaking with and ask when you will be able to have a copy of the accident’s report.
Even minor collisions can result to injury so make sure you seek out medical treatment right away. If a physician finds that you have been injured by the accident and you would like to receive compensation to help cover treatment costs, the next step is to consult with an experienced personal injury lawyer. They will be the ones to advise you on the next steps you should take.
Selling can be incredibly difficult, especially if you are not aware how to make heads or tails of how to sell mineral rights in the first place. There are a lot of buyers who might take advantage of that. If you are not careful with these rights, you might be pressured into selling what is rightfully yours for a price that is quite significantly cheaper than what it is actually worth. If you are looking to sell, it would be much better to contact an expert in order to get a better quote for how much your mineral rights are worth and to get a buyer that is respectable and trustworthy.
There are some buyers who might not have the right kind of credit history, thereby cheating you out of not just your rights but also your time as there could be legal disputes on the table should a deal go awry. Another option that is available to you, with regard to your mineral rights, is to lease them out. However, this is more advisable to those who have a history with the industry. Leasing out your rights can be complicated, if this is not your primary concern. Selling, though complicated, usually involves just the one handout and direct payment, allowing you then to be completely cleared of responsibilities that tie you in with this market.
It is also difficult to have to deal with mineral rights as they entail many legal circumstances and arduous procedures, often leading to stressful deadline complications or problems with documentations. The market also fluctuates, regarding how much these rights can be worth when sold, and that is something that needs to be accounted for when selling.
If you or someone you know is looking towards selling their mineral rights, it is of the utmost importance that you place your trust into reputable, expert helping hands, in order to receive the best deal, with as little delay and stress as possible.
Yet another wonder drug by big drug companies is about to be brought to its knees for allegations of misrepresentation and failure to warn. This time, oral anticoagulant Xarelto of the direct Factor Xa (10-a) inhibitor class is taking center stage.
A woman in Kentucky named Virginia Stuntebeck filed a lawsuit suit against Xarelto US distributor Johnson & Johnson and manufacturer Bayer AG in federal court on February 18, 2014. In June, the federal judge remanded the case to Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.
Xarelto (rivaroxaban) was approved in July 2011 by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of blood clotting in patients with atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), a condition in which the blood can pool in the heart and form clots which may cause pulmonary embolism or stroke. A further approval for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was granted in November 2011. However, the FDA has refused multiple times to approve its use as a treatment for acute coronary syndrome, perhaps in response to the growing number of complaints being reported.
The main allegation in the Stuntebeck case was that the drug was too dangerous to be sold. It was filed directly after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that drug companies can be held liable for marketing pharmaceuticals that were inherently too risky to use. Stuntebeck was prescribed with Xarelto in June 2012 to manage her atrial fibrillation, and had to be rushed to the hospital for uncontrollable gastrointestinal bleeding in February 2013.
According to the website of lawyers Williams Kherkher, 72 Xarelto-related deaths have been reported by Bayer for the first half of 2013 alone, compared to the 58 reported for 2012. If you suspect that serious injuries you have sustained may have been due to Xarelto, do not hesitate to contact a defective drugs lawyer in your area to find out if you are eligible for compensation.